Compared with Ti's 'back and forth' approach, Tj's series was very focused and time-efficient. Ti and T2 also showed some systematic, but their evaluations seemed to be more shallow for they made only very brief remarks on different portions of the various units, without achieving T3's systematic approach at a deeper class. Tj knew what he was looking for in evaluating a textbook, and he knew where to find it. This difference could be vital because the large magnitude placed on textbooks in language education (e.g. Cunningsworth 1984; Hutchinson and Torres 1994) method that teachers need to understand how to reckon textbooks efficiently and mainly.
Ta took a more straight reach, although it was not necessarily more time-efficient. He quickly found all the components of the book, looked at the front and back covers of the books and then flicked through either the student's book and the teacher's book ahead returning to the contents pages. He then looked through each sheet of the student's book in rotate,Sexy Sleepwear Sleeping Glamorously, until he reached Unit 13 (of 14). At this stage he referred to the teacher's book for Unit i and likened it to the student's book. He reiterated this process for 6 additional units and then returned anew to the starting of the student's book and flicked through both books once more, before giving an overall evaluation of the textbook package.
All the instructors began at looking by the brief provided, and then at the contents pages and all at some stage saw at all the different components of the scheme: the student's book, the teacher's paperback, and the mini-grammar booklet. However, there was a remove inconsistency in the 3 teachers in the route they emulated meantime they were evaluating the textbook.
tiffany charm bracelet,,Ti began at Unit i, but did not detect an activity that she thought to be appropriate because a 1st course ('a warmer') and so jumped to Unit 5. This was an manifestation of her greater care as classroom logistics than for the overall evaluation of the textbook. She then opened the teacher's book and surveyed the portrayal of the workbook and the Tag Heuer Carrera Replica methodological guidelines. This led her to look in the mini-grammar booklet, by flicking via the student's book until she found it (creased into a pocket in the back cover). Of the three participants, Ti appeared to be the least versed with the commonalities of textbook layout. She then flicked through the mini-grammar booklet, and kept it to hand while she looked at various appearances of the student's book: pronunciation, speaking (including the 'activity bank'), functional language, and glossary go. For every of these areas of language, she looked at how it was covered in three alternatively four of the units, using the contents pages to find the proper segments. Finally, she returned to the teacher's book and looked at the teaching memoranda in more elaborate.
T3, ashore the other hand, adopted a more selective approach. He determined early on to focus on Unit 4, explaining that he anticipated the textbook to have 'settled down' by then. He looked at all the activities in this unit while referring to the other components of the lesson. Then he turned to the teacher's book and compared it to the student's book for Unit 4. He then looked at the Cartier Tank Replica theory notes in the teacher's book in more detail, before briefly looking through Unit 8, comparing the student's book to the teaching notes.
没有评论:
发表评论